FROM : Examining Urban Trauma: Trends, Outcomes, and Research Methods in the Literature

The title is good but can be better. It is broad and doesn’t tell the reader what field or topic the author is addressing. It can be made more specific e.g.  “Examining Urban Trauma: Trends, Outcomes, and Research Methods in the Literature"

Agree with the reviewers comments and updated the title of the article to: "Examining Urban Trauma: Trends, Outcomes, and Research Methods in the Literature"

Abstract is well written but answer the following:

What is the scope?

What are the key themes and functions?

What are your contributions and significance?

Make these clear and it should be great

I updated the abstract section to answer the questions from the reviewer.  I also included an update keyword section.

Yes, but can be improved if the author is consistent with terminologies. E.g. the use of "trauma exposure", "urban trauma", "chronic trauma" must be used precisely and consistently, or defined early in the manuscript.

I provided a definition of “urban trauma” in the introduction section.I provided a definition with citations for “chronic trauma.

The sections are appropriate in my opinion. The section on Socioeconomic Disparity should mention “intersectionality” too.

Agree with the reviewer’s comments and I added a discussion on intersectionality in the section on socioeconomic disparity.

The author did well citing relevant literature however, they need to clarify the institutional authorship for reports like those from the “Centre for Urban Design and Mental Health or Urban Health Council” to make them specificand traceable to the original studies.The study from SpringerLink (2022) should be replaced with or supplemented by a peer-reviewed journal citation or be specified.Add a couple recent references to the intervention section.

Updated citation for the “Centre for Urban Design & Mental Health”