Transparent Review Policy: All journals under Gexin Publications employ a transparent peer review process. In our commitment to promoting transparency, accountability, and fostering open scientific discourse, we have adopted a review system where peer review reports are published openly alongside the article.

If a manuscript is accepted and published, the peer review reports will be made publicly available on the journal’s website along with the article. These reports will offer readers valuable insight into the reviewers’ comments and feedback, enhancing understanding of the research evaluation process.

• Any comments that reviewers wish to keep confidential between themselves and the editors/authors will not be published.
• Reviewer names will remain anonymous unless a reviewer explicitly requests to have their identity disclosed.
• The PDF version of the article will not include the peer review reports; they will be accessible only via the online journal platform.

Peer Review Process: Upon submission, the Handling Editor will invite at least two expert reviewers in the relevant field based on the manuscript’s title and abstract. Reviewers are expected to respond promptly to invitations and provide timely, constructive, and objective evaluations.

Reviewers should submit:

• Clear and specific suggestions
• Honest corrections
• Detailed comments that enhance the accuracy, clarity, and completeness of the manuscript

The Editor will forward the review reports to the author(s) without alteration for consideration and revision. Final decisions regarding acceptance or rejection rest with the Editor, guided by reviewer feedback.