+91 7682 015 542       info@gexinonline.com

  • Account
    • Sign In
      • Author
      • Editor
      • Reviewer
    • Sign Up
      • Author
logo
  • Home
  • Open Access
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Our Team
  • Journal
  • Submission
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Review Process
    • Join As Reviewers
    • Our Reviewers
  • Policies & Ethics
    • Open Access Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Review Policy
    • Correction, Retraction, Withdrawal Policies
    • Digital Preservation Policy
    • Waiver Policy
    • Complaints Policy
    • Advertising Policy
    • Data Sharing Policy
    • Policy on Statement of Informed Consent
    • Policy on Ethics of Human and Animal Experimentation
  • Contact Us
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Review Process
  • Author Guidelines
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Special Issues
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issue
Journal of Comprehensive Pure and Applied Mathematics
Full-Text HTML   Full-Text PDF  

Journal of Comprehensive Pure and Applied Mathematics, Article ID: JCPAM-121

https://doi.org/10.33790/jcpam1100121

Research Article

Explicit constructions of self-indexing height Morse functions on tori

Prof. Yasuhiko Kamiyama

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara-Cho, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan.

Corresponding Author Details: Prof. Yasuhiko Kamiyama, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara-Cho, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan.

Received date: 02nd September, 2025

Accepted date: 11th November, 2025

Published date: 14th November, 2025

Citation: Kamiyama, Y. (2025). Explicit constructions of self-indexing height Morse functions on tori. J Comp Pure Appl Math, 3(2):1-06. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33790/cpam1100121.

Copyright: ©2025, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A Morse function \(f\) on a connected closed manifold \(M\) is called a self-indexing function if the index of \(f\) at \(p\) is equal to \(f(p)\) for any critical point \(p\) of \(f\). We consider the following question: Does there exist an embedding $$\varepsilon_n: (S^1)^n \to \R^{n+1}$$

such that \(p_1\circ\varepsilon_n\) is a self-indexing Morse function? Here \(p_1\:\R^{n+1}\to \R$ is the first projection.

In this paper, we give an affirmative answer to the question for the case $n=1$ or $2$. For that purpose, we construct embeddings $\varepsilon_n$ explicitly. On the other hand, for $n\geq 3$, we prove a weaker version of the question. That is, we construct an embedding $$\delta_n:(S^1)^n \to \R^{n+2}$$

such that $p_1\circ \delta_n$ is a self-indexing Morse function. Here $p_1:\R^{n+2}\to \R$ is the first projection.

Introduction

Self-indexing Morse function

A Morse function \(f\) on a connected closed manifold \(M\) is called a self-indexing function if the index of \(f\) at \(p\) is equal to \(f(p)\) for any critical point \(p\) of \(f\). The existence of a self-indexing function was proved by Smale [5] and successfully used by him in solving the Poincaré conjecture. (See also [2] and [3].)

Height function

Let \(f\) be a Morse function on a connected closed manifold \(M\). Assume that there is an embedding \(\mu: M \to {\mathbb R}^d\) such that \(f=p_1\circ \mu\), where \(p_1: {\mathbb R}^d\to {\mathbb R}\) denotes the first projection. In this case, we call \(f\) a height function.

A question

In [4], it is asked whether \((S^1)^2\) admits a self-indexing Morse function which is also a height function. More precisely, does there exist an embedding \[\varepsilon_2: (S^1)^2 \to {\mathbb R}^3\] such that \(p_1\circ \varepsilon_2\) is a self-indexing Morse function?

In [4], an answer is given by showing an embedding by a picture. It is desirable to provide an explicit formula for the embedding.

Generalization and summary of the result

Generalizing the question in §1.3, we pose the following:

Question 1. Does there exist an embedding \[\varepsilon_n: (S^1)^n \to {\mathbb R}^{n+1}\] such that \(p_1 \circ \varepsilon_n\) is a self-indexing Morse function? Here \(p_1:{\mathbb R}^{n+1}\to {\mathbb R}\) is the first projection.

The purpose of this paper is to study Question 1. We summarize the main results in §2 as follows:

Theorem 2. (i)For \(n\geq 1\), we define \[f_n: (S^1)^n \to {\mathbb R}\] by \[\label{jul28a} f_n(e^{i\theta_1},\dots,e^{i \theta_n})= \sum_{i=1}^n \log_3(2+\cos \theta_i)--------------------(1).\] Then \(f_n\) is a self-indexing Morse function.

(ii) We define \(\varepsilon_2: (S^1)^2 \to {\mathbb R}^3\) by \[\varepsilon_2 (e^{i \theta_1},e^{i \theta_2}):= (f_2(e^{i \theta_1},e^{i \theta_2}), (2+\sin \theta_1)\cos \theta_2,(2+\sin \theta_1)\sin \theta_2).\] Then \(\varepsilon_2\) is an embedding. Thus we have obtained an explicit answer to the question in §1.3.

The organization of this paper

This paper is organized as follows. In §2 we state our main results and in §3 we prove them.

Main results

Theorem A . For \(n\geq 1\), we define \(f_n\) as in (1). Then \(f_n\) is a self-indexing Morse function.

Remark 3. The function \(f_n\) is also a perfect Morse function. That is, the Morse inequalities are in fact equalities.

Theorem B. (i) We define the map \(\varepsilon_1:S^1 \to {\mathbb R}^2\) by \[\varepsilon_1(e^{i\theta_1})=(f_1(e^{i \theta_1}), \sin \theta_1).\] Then \(\varepsilon_1\) is an embedding.

(ii) We define the map \(\varepsilon_2:(S^1)^2 \to {\mathbb R}^3\) by \[\varepsilon_2(e^{i\theta_1},e^{i \theta_2})=(f_2(e^{i \theta_1},e^{i \theta_2}), (2+\sin \theta_1)\cos \theta_2,(2+\sin \theta_1)\sin \theta_2).\] Then \(\varepsilon_2\) is an embedding.

Remark 4. Combining Theorems A and B, we obtain an affirmative answer to Question 1 for the case \(n=1\) or \(2\).

We do not know whether Question 1 is true for \(n\geq 3\). But the following weaker version holds:

Theorem C. For \(n\geq 3\), there is an embedding \[\delta_n:(S^1)^n\to {\mathbb R}^{n+2}\] such that \(p_1\circ \delta_n=f_n\) holds. Here \(p_1:{\mathbb R}^{n+2}\to {\mathbb R}\) is the first projection.

Proofs of the main results

Proof of Theorem A. We obtain from (1) that \[\text{grad}\, f_n=-\frac{1}{\log 3}\left(\frac{\sin \theta_1}{2+\cos \theta_1}, \frac{\sin \theta_2}{2+\cos \theta_2},\dots,\frac{\sin \theta_n}{2+\cos \theta_n}\right).\] Hence \((e^{i\theta_1},\dots,e^{i\theta_n})\) is a critical point of \(f_n\) if and only if \(\theta_i \in \{0,\,\pi\}\) for \(1\leq i \leq n\).

To see that \(f_n\) is a Morse function, the critical points are clearly non-degenerate and the index of the critical point \((e^{i\theta_1},\dots,e^{i\theta_n})\) is equal to the number of \(\theta_i\)’s with \(\theta_i=0\). (See, for example, .)

The fact that \(f_n\) is self-indexing is proved as follows: If \((e^{i\theta_1},\dots,e^{i\theta_n})\) is a critical point of \(f_n\) of index \(k\), then we have \[f_n(e^{i\theta_1},\dots,e^{i\theta_n})=k.\hfill \qedhere\]

Proof of Theorem B. Since the proofs of (i) and (ii) are similar, we prove only (ii). We set \[\label{may12e} \varepsilon_2 (e^{i\theta_1},e^{i\theta_2})=(\xi_1,\xi_2,\xi_3).----------------(2)\] Hereafter, to say “\(\theta_i\) is determined uniquely" precisely means that there is at most one solution in \(\theta_i \;(\text{mod}\; 2\pi)\).

We need to prove that if \(\xi_1,\xi_2\) and \(\xi_3\) are given in (2), then \(\theta_1\) and \(\theta_2\) are determined uniquely. From the second and third components of \(\varepsilon_2\), we have \[\begin{aligned} &\sin \theta_1=\sqrt{\xi_2^2+\xi_3^2}-2-------------------------(3) \label{may12a}\\ {and} &\begin{dcases} \cos \theta_2=\frac{\xi_2}{\sqrt{\xi_2^2+\xi_3^2}}\\ \sin \theta_2=\frac{\xi_3}{\sqrt{\xi_2^2+\xi_3^2}}---------------------------(4)\label{may12b} \end{dcases} \end{aligned}\]

Firstly, from (4), \(\theta_2\) is determined uniquely. Secondly, from \(f_2\) in (1), we have \[\label{may12d} \large{ \cos \theta_1=\frac{3^{\xi_1}}{2+\cos \theta_2}-2.}-----------------------(5)\] Now combining (3) and (5), \(\theta_1\) is determined uniquely.

Proof of Theorem C. We first prove the following:

Lemma 5. For \(n\geq 1\), there is an embedding \[\label{sep2e} \lambda_n: (S^1)^n \to {\mathbb R}^{n+1}.-------------------------(6)\]

Proof. We prove the lemma by induction on \(n\).

Base case: We define \(\lambda_1\) to be the inclusion \(i: S^1 \to {\mathbb R}^2\).

Induction step: We show the implication ‘‘ (6) for \(n=k\)” \(\Rightarrow\) ‘‘ (6) for \(n=k+1\)”. Assume that there is an embedding \[\label{sep2d} \lambda_{k}: (S^1)^{k} \to {\mathbb R}^{k+1}.-----------------------(7)\] We define the map \[\label{sep2j} \phi: S^1 \times {\mathbb R}\to {\mathbb R}^2---------------------(8)\]by \[\phi (e^{i\theta},t) := e^t e^{i\theta}.\] Then it is clear that \(\phi\) is an embedding.

Now we define \(\lambda_{k+1}\) to be the composition of the following inclusions: \[(S^1)^{k+1} =S^1 \times (S^1)^{k}\subset S^1 \times {\mathbb R}^{k+1} =(S^1\times {\mathbb R})\times {\mathbb R}^{k} \subset {\mathbb R}^2\times {\mathbb R}^{k}={\mathbb R}^{k+2}.\] Here the left inclusion is a consequence of (7). On the other hand, the right inclusion is a consequence of (8).

Now we complete the proof of Theorem C. Using Lemma 5, we define \(\delta_n\) by \[\delta_n(e^{i\theta_1}, \dots, e^{i \theta_n}) =(f_n(e^{i\theta_1}, \dots, e^{i \theta_n}),\; \lambda_n (e^{i\theta_1}, \dots, e^{i \theta_n})).\] Then it is clear that \(\delta_n\) is an embedding such that \(p_1\circ \delta_n=f_n\).

Conclusions

We have obtained an affirmative answer to Question 1 for the case \(n=1\) or \(2\). On the other hand, for \(n\geq 3\), we obtained a weaker version of Question 1. That is, we constructed an embedding \(\delta_n: (S^1)^n \to {\mathbb R}^{n+2}\) such that \(p_1 \circ \delta_n\) is a self-indexing Morse function. To study whether Question 1 itself holds for \(n\geq 3\) is our further task.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the reviewer for carefully reading the manuscript and for valuable comments to improve it.

Conflicts of Interest:

The author declares no competing interests.

References

  1. Matsumoto, Y. (2002). An Introduction to Morse Theory, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 208, Providence, RI. View

  2. Milnor, J. (1965). Lectures on the h-cobordism Theorem, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. View

  3. Nicolaescu, L. (2011). An invitation to Morse Theory, 2nd ed., Universitext, Springer, New York. View

  4. PVAL-inactive (2016). Self-indexing Morse function on a torus which is a height function, Math-Stack-Exchange. View

  5. Smale, S. (1961). Generalized Poincar´e conjecture in dimensions greater than four, Ann. of Math. 74 , 391–406. View

LICENSE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Quick Links

  • Open Access
  • About Us
  • Journal
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Copyright & Licensing Policy

Contact Us

  • Plot No. - 814/1775, Jayar Sasan, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, Pin - 752101
  • +91 7682 015 542
  • info@gexinonline.com
MEMBER OF
JOURNAL ARCHIVED IN

© Gexin Publications.

All Rights Reserved.