FROM : Examination of the Medical Error Tendencies of Midwives and Nurses Working in Maternity Clinics

Reviewer-1 comment

The results of the paper review can be published.

I request that you check whether the references are written in accordance with the format of the journal, and recommend that you reinforce the content of your suggestions.

This paper identified trends in medical errors made by midwives and nurses in obstetrics in relation to patient safety and confirmed the current situation in the area.

After reviewing the review, I confirmed that this paper had research value as it was a scientific analysis of the need for improvement in areas where medical errors by midwives and nurses are highly likely to occur.

  And as a result of checking the writing of the paper, the necessity and purpose of the research, research method, research results, discussion, and conclusion were consistent. In particular, the researcher made an effort to support the results by comparing them with previous studies in writing the discussion and developed it logically. However, I would like to see the researcher's suggestions added.

That is all.

Response-1

Thank you very much for your kind and valuable comments.

* The references of the article have been reviewed.

* Recommendations section has been expanded.

Reviewer-2 Comments

This article provides an overview of the major elements of a comprehensive manuscript review. The article also illustrates some of the basic responsibilities of the reviewer and describes some of the benefits and burdens associated with this role. Scholars may find this article useful as they conduct critical reviews of research papers.

Kindly proceed for publications

Response-2

Thank you for your review