FROM : Cybersecurity Benefits and Challenges of Advanced Healthcare Technologies

Review Comments-1

The title is suitable as it clearly reflects the manuscript's focus on both the benefits and cybersecurity risks associated with advanced technologies in healthcare. It succinctly captures the key themes of technological innovationand the security challenges that come with their use in the healthcare sector.

As per my opinion, below are the few alternative title that I suggest:

- "Cybersecurity Challenges and Benefits of Advanced Healthcare Technologies"
- "Navigating the Risks and Rewards of Advanced Technologies in Healthcare"
- "Advanced Healthcare Technologies: Exploring Cybersecurity Benefits and Risks"

We use “ Cybersecurity Benefits and Challenges of Advanced Healthcare Technologies”.

We have updated the title in the revised paper.

The English quality is generally suitable for scholarly communication. It is clear and formal, though some sentences could be slightly refined for better clarity.

Yes, we have corrected some mistakes. Please see pages 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in the revised paper.

The sections of the manuscript are well-organized and appropriately cover the technologies, their benefits, and cybersecurity risks. However, the transitions between sections could be smoother, and the conclusion could be more concise in summarizing the key points.

Yes, we have added some information to smooth/improve the transitions between sections. Please see page 5.

A disclaimer is not required but could provide helpful transparency if the manuscript has been revised or submitted elsewhere.

The paper has never been submitted to any journal or conference. It is not an extended version of any published paper.

Specific Comments:

It covers important topics and is generally well-written, but improvements in clarity, transitions between sections, and more recent references could enhance its quality.

Yes, we have added some information, corrected some mistakes, and improved the quality of the paper.

Review Comments-2

1. Paper needs to follow IEEE format

Yes, we have revised our paper according to the sample papers (published in the journal JITI) and the IEEE format.

2. Diagrams should be legible and it seems it copied

Yes, we have saved the diagrams in *.bmp and inserted them in the revised paper. They are improved.

3. Methodology needs to improve

Yes, we have added research methodology. Please see pages 2-3.

Thank you very much for your suggestions and comments that helped improve the quality of our paper. We have read the suggestions and comments carefully and revised the paper. We have added much information in the paper.

We have answered your questions and provided the numbers of pages or sections where we have made revisions so that you can locate our revisions easily. Please check our revised paper and the revised information (marked in red in the revised paper).